douglas_clegg
douglas_clegg
douglas_clegg
douglas_clegg
douglas_clegg
douglas_clegg
douglas_clegg
douglas_clegg

douglas_clegg
douglas_clegg
Here's the cybercover for my upcoming serial that will begin its run this summer.
douglas_clegg
douglas_clegg
douglas_clegg
douglas_clegg
douglas_clegg
douglas_cleggJust married, November 17th. That is all for now.
douglas_clegg
And in very sad news, my colleague Michael Crichton has died. He will be missed. I am a fan of his fiction.
douglas_clegg
douglas_clegg
Success and Value are two ideas I've been mulling over for a few years. There can be success with little or no value to what is successful, so that what is a success today is discarded six months from now and becomes a withering laurel wreath.
But value seems different to me, particularly when it comes to fiction. A novel or story of value does not need to be a success (even though it is, by another use of the word, a successful novel or story -- in terms of its value.)
This is often the struggle in writing for a living: to create a valuable story or novel, something that has meaning as well as an entertaining storyline. But success? That's up to someone else other than myself -- the publisher, the bookseller, the reader.
All I can do is work on creating a story of value. I've certainly struggled with the idea of success for more than 20 years -- and when I've had a measure of it, suddenly I measure it differently and don't feel successful at all. It's a moving scale that is always just out of reach.
But when I look back over more than 24 books I've created, I am happy with a handful of them in terms of their value as stories and novels -- regardless of whether or not they were successful as defined by popular consumption or acclaim or awards. My novels Neverland and The Hour Before Dark and The Priest of Blood and Mordred, Bastard Son stand out to me among all my novels. Yet none of them won awards, and although all sold well (and one sold slightly better than well), it's not as if Danielle Steel or James Patterson got knocked off their thrones.
To me, those four novels have great value as fiction, and I am proud of them. Other novels of mine, a little less so, although many of them were fun to write and others were dogs to write but I felt I was heading toward something important -- to me -- with them.
I've been working too slowly on a novel, and one of the reasons being I want to reinvent what I'm writing from the ground up -- I don't want to get to the end of my life and look back and think, "Well, I fulfilled expectations, yay me."
I want to look back and feel I created a value in fiction itself, regardless of the success of my career. I suppose I am using the words "success" and "value" to denote "career" versus "life."
I'd rather have a life than a career, and I'd rather create value in my work than claim success with it.
This note was prompted partly because I'd been thinking over all this after several letters from aspiring writers about "becoming successful," had me remembering that I wanted the same thing when I wrote my first novel. I wanted success. But success constantly redefines itself as each hoop is jumped -- a vanishing target that briefly teases to let you know it might be reachable. But it never really is, except in the perception of others.
But value? The value in fiction is in the ability of the writer to capture -- and release -- something eternally true in the human condition through the entertainment of a story.
![]() |
You are viewing Create a LiveJournal Account Learn more | Explore LJ: Life Entertainment Music Culture News & Politics Technology |